38. Bob Dylan, "Blonde on Blonde"

 


Remember when we played covers-better-than-the-originals the other day?  I've got another one for you, Nashville country-punk progenitors Jason and the Scorchers completely DESTROYING "Absolutely Sweet Marie," from this Dylan album:


Sorry about the wretched video quality, but at least the audio is good.  Now compare that to the Dylan original, which, admittedly, is a rocker by the standards of the album but pales in comparison to the Scorchers' version.

We're up in the stratosphere now at number 38, and everyone of these albums from now on will be revered by lots of people, even if they're overrated like this album.  (Don't worry, we're gonna see more hugely overrated albums before we're done.)  Like the Scorchers version, this album was recorded largely in Nashville, not quite 20 years earlier.  Dylan used Nashville session musicians, widely recognized as some of the best musicians in the world at the time, along with some of his regular band, and it's an interesting mashup between Dylan's shaggy style and the virtuosity of the band behind him.

There are a lot of famous songs on this record, which is probably why it's thought of as "an album of enormous depth, providing endless lyrical and musical revelations on each play."  There's "Stuck Inside of Mobile With the Memphis Blues Again," with that famous title hook, a great song that, I'm sorry, is like 2 verses too long.  In fact, you could say that about a lot of the songs on this album.  Dylan was always an artist in awe of his own prodigious output, and it really shows here.  On the other hand, "I Want You," which sounds like it was made specifically to later appear in Wes Anderson films, is an uptempo jam with the usual inscrutable lyrics:

The drunken politician leaps
Upon the streets where mothers weep
And the saviors who are fast asleep
They wait for you
And I wait for them to interrupt
Me drinkin' from my broken cup
And ask me to open up the gate for you
I want you, I want you
Yes, I want you so bad
Honey, I want you

There are books and books trying to puzzle out the deep meanings of Dylan's lyrics, but having written lyrics myself, they seem to me like a guy who's probably fairly stoned thinking of words that rhyme and then backfilling the rest of each line.  Or maybe they're profound Jungian insights into the world-mind, who the fuck knows.

The song I like the best is the one true Dylanheads hate the most, "Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35," with what sounds like a marching band backing Dylan's insistence that "everybody must get stoned."  It's a novelty song, sure, but what appeals to me isn't the music itself or the lyrics, but Dylan's audible laughter on the track.  He sounds like he's having a blast, and I've always found that so humanizing for a guy who usually sounds so serious to the point of being dour.  It really made Bob Dylan into a real person for me.

I like "Just Like a Woman" okay too.  Allegedly about Edie Sedgwick, it's got that heartbreaking line "she breaks just like a little girl."  That is super-evocative and conveys so much sadness and pain in one line, just a great lyric.  And I can take "Leopard-Skin Pill-Box Hat," basically a straight-ahead blues jam with some great Robbie Robertson guitar playing. 

I know "Visions of Johanna" and "Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands" are regarded as masterpieces but I'm pretty meh on both of them.  (Email angry comments to 40goingon28@gmail.com.)  They both drag for me and I'm impatient and want things to happen in songs.

If you want to know how overseriously people take Bob Dylan, read the part of the Wiki about the title of this album.  There are like competing theories and it has hilarious phrases like "Kazimir Malevich's constructivist painting White Square on White" and "A brand new interpretation appeared in a French essay published in 2021."  Jesus Christ people, he probably just thought it sounded cool.  No constructivism involved.

Same thing with the cover: people speculated it's blurry because it's supposed to simulate tripping on LSD or something, but it was cold out and the photographer was shivering.  Occam's razor strikes again.

But that's the problem with Dylan!  He really was a groundbreaking and brilliant artist and so people have imbued him with so much meaning that it's hard to just listen to his songs as songs any more.  They all have to mean something ultra deep and be part of the fabric of the universe instead of stuff a stoned 24-year-old recorded in 1966.

Is this album in my personal Top 100? Nope!

Comments

  1. StephenDecember 8, 2022 at 7:38 PM

    I love a lot of Dylan, but so much of this 60's stuff is catchy and pleasant, but NOT the work of some genius poet. It really is just random rhyme generating. I think he's at his best on Blood on the Tracks, years later.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

103. De La Soul, "Three Feet High And Rising"

Image
  Sorry for the service interruption!  Monday I had, like, work stuff to do and yesterday I was picking my wife up at the airport and they lost her bag and we had to file a claim about that and by the time I got home it was well into my Work Hours and you know, I'm just sorry.  (This was tail end of quite a journey for my wife that found her taking off in Ireland and landing in Newark, New Jersey, and then sitting in a plane for almost three hours and then the flight just getting cancelled and then staying in the Courtyard by Marriott in downtown Newark, NJ [not recommended, she says] and then getting on a flight to SFO at 6:30 am and finally getting back here a solid 14 hours later than expected.) Speaking of the greater New York City metropolitan area, a group of kids from Amityville, Long Island, got together in 1988 and started making songs and released this album, one of the best in hip hop or any other genre, in 1989.  De La have been called the "Beatles of hip...
Read more

3. Joni Mitchell, "Blue"

Image
  Do you want the good news or the meh news first?  The good news is that this album is better than the other Joni Mitchell albums we've seen , or at least better for me.  I hated one of them and barely tolerated the other, so I was not expecting to like this, and after three listens yesterday, it was not as bad as I'd feared it would be.  The meh news?  I still don't love Joni Mitchell and I don't particularly like this album. Obviously, since it's the number 3 out of the Top 500 albums ever made, a lot of people feel differently.  Pitchfork called it "possibly the most gutting break-up album ever made," which may be true, who knows, but if it is it's about breaking up with a whole series of dudes, from Graham Nash to James Taylor to some guy named Carey.  (In Pitchfork's estimation, this is the 86th best album of the 1970s, so not exactly in number 3 overall territory). One thing that bugs me is Joni Mitchell's voice, which I find kind of g...
Read more

1. Marvin Gaye, "What’s Going On"

Image
  500 albums later and we're out of albums.  This album was number 6 on the last iteration of the Rolling Stone list and has now moved up to number 1 (displacing Sgt. Pepper , which was the last album to hold that spot).  I think it's a lovely album with maybe three absolutely incredible songs, a fair amount of average-to-good, and some not great songs.  I'm not a voter and will never be a voter but I just don't think this is the best album of all time. In fact, I would be perfectly fine with this list if they just sawed off the top 3 and left the rest as is: 1. Stevie Wonder, Songs in the Key of Life 2. Beatles, Abbey Road 3. Nirvana, Nevermind 4. Fleetwood Mac, Rumours And so forth.  But let's take this album on its own merits. The first of the three absolute bangers is the title track, "What's Going On," the scene-setter for the rest of the album, a loose concept album that's told from the point of view of a Vietnam vet returning to a country th...
Read more