197. The Beatles, "Meet the Beatles!"

 


Get your head around this: I am a late-middle-aged white guy who considers himself a moderate Beatles fan and I learned yesterday there are Beatles songs I have never heard.  Not obscure B-sides that only came out in England or weird solo stuff, but actual Lennon/McCartney Beatles songs that are on an album from 1964!  Songs that grandparents and great-grandparents much, much older than me know by heart.  It is wild!  I attribute this to a couple of factors: (1) I never owned this album, duh; my Beatles interest is much more focused on the later stuff, like starting from Sgt. Pepper's; (2) In the era of my life when I would sit down with someone and listen to an entire album all the way through, it would have been comically uncool to listen to this album all the way through; and (3) once streaming started and you could listen to anything you wanted any time, it just never occurred to me.  So, new Beatles songs!  (I've never watched "The Wire" either, but don't start with me.)

Of course I know the first two, "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and "I Saw Her Standing There."  I'm pretty sure I know "It Won't Be Long."  As far as I know, this is my first encounter with "All I've Got to Do," a Lennon joint with a lovely, swinging melody.  The background vocals are just OK, though.  The George Harrison song, "Don't Bother Me," is really good!  You can sort of hear Harrison's sound developing even this early.  Poor George.  

When I heard "Till There Was You" at first I was like "huh, this is different," but then I saw it was a cover.  It was in "The Music Man"?  I do not know a lot about musicals.  "Hold Me Tight" is in the same vein - that sort of frenetic, bouncy, shuffly rock.  In fact, my big takeaway is that the songs (at least the ones I didn't know) are sort of hard to differentiate!  The Beatles at this point had a sound, for sure, and they were good at plugging songs into that sound.  

Despite the big "The first album" hype on the cover, this was not actually the Beatles' first album, either in England or the US.  It seems that Vee-Jay records jumped Capitol and released Introducing.. The Beatles (which was like half covers anyway) 10 days before this came out.  That kind of shit just does not happen any more.  Imagine Columbia getting ready to release Adele's 19 and then Drag City releasing Introducing... Adele a few days before it's supposed to come out.  LOL.

Hey, if you've got $2,495 laying around, you could pick up this still-sealed first pressing of this album!  It would be such a rush to rip that plastic off and slap that baby down on the turntable.

Does this album deserve to be in the Top 500? All the Beatles albums do.  It's the Beatles.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

103. De La Soul, "Three Feet High And Rising"

Image
  Sorry for the service interruption!  Monday I had, like, work stuff to do and yesterday I was picking my wife up at the airport and they lost her bag and we had to file a claim about that and by the time I got home it was well into my Work Hours and you know, I'm just sorry.  (This was tail end of quite a journey for my wife that found her taking off in Ireland and landing in Newark, New Jersey, and then sitting in a plane for almost three hours and then the flight just getting cancelled and then staying in the Courtyard by Marriott in downtown Newark, NJ [not recommended, she says] and then getting on a flight to SFO at 6:30 am and finally getting back here a solid 14 hours later than expected.) Speaking of the greater New York City metropolitan area, a group of kids from Amityville, Long Island, got together in 1988 and started making songs and released this album, one of the best in hip hop or any other genre, in 1989.  De La have been called the "Beatles of hip hop"
Read more

3. Joni Mitchell, "Blue"

Image
  Do you want the good news or the meh news first?  The good news is that this album is better than the other Joni Mitchell albums we've seen , or at least better for me.  I hated one of them and barely tolerated the other, so I was not expecting to like this, and after three listens yesterday, it was not as bad as I'd feared it would be.  The meh news?  I still don't love Joni Mitchell and I don't particularly like this album. Obviously, since it's the number 3 out of the Top 500 albums ever made, a lot of people feel differently.  Pitchfork called it "possibly the most gutting break-up album ever made," which may be true, who knows, but if it is it's about breaking up with a whole series of dudes, from Graham Nash to James Taylor to some guy named Carey.  (In Pitchfork's estimation, this is the 86th best album of the 1970s, so not exactly in number 3 overall territory). One thing that bugs me is Joni Mitchell's voice, which I find kind of g
Read more

1. Marvin Gaye, "What’s Going On"

Image
  500 albums later and we're out of albums.  This album was number 6 on the last iteration of the Rolling Stone list and has now moved up to number 1 (displacing Sgt. Pepper , which was the last album to hold that spot).  I think it's a lovely album with maybe three absolutely incredible songs, a fair amount of average-to-good, and some not great songs.  I'm not a voter and will never be a voter but I just don't think this is the best album of all time. In fact, I would be perfectly fine with this list if they just sawed off the top 3 and left the rest as is: 1. Stevie Wonder, Songs in the Key of Life 2. Beatles, Abbey Road 3. Nirvana, Nevermind 4. Fleetwood Mac, Rumours And so forth.  But let's take this album on its own merits. The first of the three absolute bangers is the title track, "What's Going On," the scene-setter for the rest of the album, a loose concept album that's told from the point of view of a Vietnam vet returning to a country th
Read more